Sie sind bereits registriert?
Loggen Sie sich mit Ihrem Universimed-Benutzerkonto ein:
Sie sind noch nicht registriert?
Registrieren Sie sich jetzt kostenlos auf universimed.com und erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen Artikeln, bewerten Sie Inhalte und speichern Sie interessante Beiträge in Ihrem persönlichen Bereich
zum späteren Lesen. Ihre Registrierung ist für alle Unversimed-Portale gültig. (inkl. allgemeineplus.at & med-Diplom.at)
Evolving Management Options for High-Risk Prostate Cancer
Up to 50% of men with prostate cancer who undergo curative intent local therapy (surgery/radiotherapy) experience biochemical failure (rising prostate-specific antigen [PSA]). Short PSA doubling times (<9 months) have been shown to correlate with more-rapid disease progression and death from prostate cancer.
Investigators conducted a pharmaceutical-sponsored, multinational, phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of enzalutamide plus the luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone agonist leuprolide compared with leuprolide alone in patients with prostate cancer and high-risk biochemical failure.
Eligible patients had PSA doubling times of ≤9 months after definitive local treatment, serum testosterone levels ≥150 ng/dL, and no evidence of metastatic disease on computed tomography and bone-scan imaging. A total of 1068 patients were randomized to receive enzalutamide plus leuprolide, placebo plus leuprolide, or enzalutamide monotherapy. Patients' median age was 69 years, 83% were white, the median PSA doubling time was 4.9 months, and the median PSA was 5.2 ng/mL.
At a median follow-up of 60.7 months, metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 87.3% in the combination arm, 71.4% in the leuprolide arm, and 80.0% in the enzalutamide arm. MFS was superior in the combination arm compared to the leuprolide arm (hazard ratio, 0.42; P<0.001) — the primary end point. MFS was also improved in the enzalutamide monotherapy arm compared with the leuprolide arm (HR, 0.63; P=0.005). While no new safety signals emerged, there was more treatment-related toxicity in the combination arm than in the leuprolide arm.
Comment
The results of this well-done clinical trial support the role of “early” intervention with combined therapy in a subset of men with prostate cancer at high risk. However, as noted by an editorialist, the challenge of risk assessment for individual patients remains a critical issue — in this trial, approximately 30% of deaths were from non–prostate-cancer causes, which emphasizes the need for prolonged follow-up in this population.
Citation(s)
Author:
Freedland SJ et al.
Title:
Improved outcomes with enzalutamide in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer.
Source:
N Engl J Med
2023
Oct
19; [e-pub].
(Abstract/FREE Full Text)
Author:
Aparicio A.
Title:
Biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer — Tilting the scale.
Source:
N Engl J Med
2023
Oct
19; [e-pub].
(Abstract/FREE Full Text)
Empfohlen von
Robert Dreicer, MD, MS, MACP, FASCO