Sie sind bereits registriert?
Loggen Sie sich mit Ihrem Universimed-Benutzerkonto ein:
Sie sind noch nicht registriert?
Registrieren Sie sich jetzt kostenlos auf universimed.com und erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen Artikeln, bewerten Sie Inhalte und speichern Sie interessante Beiträge in Ihrem persönlichen Bereich
zum späteren Lesen. Ihre Registrierung ist für alle Unversimed-Portale gültig. (inkl. allgemeineplus.at & med-Diplom.at)
Replacing Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Mantle Cell Lymphoma?
Prior phase 3 trials established autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) consolidation and maintenance rituximab as standards of care in younger, transplant-eligible patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Now, investigators report a multinational, industry-sponsored, phase 3 trial testing incorporation of the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) ibrutinib into induction and maintenance therapy.
A total of 870 patients (median age, 57 years; 76% male; 98% white) were randomized to one of three regimens:
- Six alternating cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) and rituximab, dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin (R-DHAP), followed by ASCT consolidation in responding patients (arm A)
- The above regimen plus ibrutinib added to R-CHOP cycles and 2 years of ibrutinib maintenance therapy, with ASCT for responding patients (arm A+I)
- The A+I regimen without ASCT (arm I)
Patients in all arms also could receive rituximab maintenance according to local guidelines.
At a median follow-up of 31 months, 3-year failure-free survival (FFS; the primary outcome) was superior for arm A+I compared with arm A (88% vs. 72%; hazard ratio, 0.52; P=0.0008). FFS favored arm I over arm A (86% vs. 72%) but the difference did not reach significance (HR, 1.77). Cumulative 3-year treatment failure rates were 21.9% in arm A, 60.0% in arm A+I, and 10.8% in arm I. Outcomes for patients with poor-risk mantle cell lymphoma international prognostic index (MIPI) scores and p53 overexpression were significantly improved in the ibrutinib-containing arms compared with arm A. Grade 3–5 toxicities were similar during induction therapy with and without ibrutinib; however, adverse hematologic and infectious events were higher during maintenance therapy in arm A+I.
Comment
This practice-changing study demonstrates a clear benefit for incorporating ibrutinib into induction and maintenance therapy, although the data as yet are inconclusive regarding elimination of high-dose chemotherapy plus ASCT. As noted by editorialists, application of these findings in the U.S. is challenged by the withdrawal of ibrutinib for its MCL indication and the lack of phase 3 data for incorporating an alternative BTKi into induction and maintenance therapy. Nonetheless, this trial lights a pathway toward de-escalated treatment intensity and improved outcomes in younger patients with MCL.
Citation(s)
Author:
Dreyling M et al.
Title:
Ibrutinib combined with immunochemotherapy with or without autologous stem-cell transplantation versus immunochemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation in previously untreated patients with mantle cell lymphoma (TRIANGLE): A three-arm, randomised, open-label, phase 3 superiority trial of the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network.
Source:
Lancet
2024
May
25; [e-pub].
(Abstract/FREE Full Text)
Author:
Martin P and Maddocks K.
Title:
Does TRIANGLE take down transplantation in mantle cell lymphoma?
Source:
Lancet
2024
May
25; [e-pub].
(Abstract/FREE Full Text)
Empfohlen von
Michael E. Williams, MD, ScM